|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
re: re: A dangerous idea
*nod* Inactive members is a constant controversy, much like wishlist emails. Now the forums are another topic. Any suggestions on how to improve the forums? :)
|
|
infiniteletters
13 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
re: re: A dangerous idea
Inventory in inactive accounts isn't important when they can be put on vacation by cancelling a mooch after 7 days. Now, marking when wishlisters are inactive, that would be useful. Some of us like the looks and simple design of this site. If you want shiny and graphic-heavy, go elsewhere *shrug*. Ask first on pending would be much more useful, as that directly affects what mooches go through.
|
|
infiniteletters
13 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
re: re: A dangerous idea
I never can understand members who have problems finding things to mooch. I have problems _not_ finding things to mooch. :) Now postage and space for books, those are universal problems.
|
|
infiniteletters
13 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
re: Not much junk on BM
Scarface123, why would you not try to mooch a book from them? Just this week, I asked someone to Angel a book for me from someone in another country. That person hadn't been on for 500 days, but logged in and accepted the mooch. I also cancelled 2 mooches that hadn't been accepted in a month from 2 members.
|
|
infiniteletters
13 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
re: Not much junk on BM
What about having a list of books that have available for 2+ years? Like recently added, but the reverse? Or elimininating the listing .1 point for books over a certain threshold (10-20+ copies)? Please don't auto-vacation inactive members. I have gotten books from "inactive" members, and am fine with cancelling after a week to vacation those that are truly inactive.
|
|
infiniteletters
13 years ago
|
|
|
|
